| Base Name | Stored hay from East |
| Treatments, Standards and Routes | Average hay storage |
| Mix and Location | Silage or haylage in vertical silo (14%), silage or haylage in horizontal silo (6%), silage or haylage sealed in plastic (19%) and hay in round bales (61%). |
| Functional Unit Flow Properties | The dataset includes material and infrastructure inputs, as well as storage loss. Quantities are per metric tonne of hay (corrected to 90% dry matter). |
| Name Synonyms | silage; haylage; bales |
| Quantitative Reference | stored hay |
| Dataset Starting Year | 2009 |
| Dataset Valid Until | 2018 |
| Time Representativity | Ten-year average |
| Technology Characteristics | NA |
| Intended Process Applications | Stored hay modelled in this dataset is intended for cattles. |
| Ecospold Activity Type | 1 |
| Ecospold Special Activity Type | 0 |
| Classification | Agricultural production means (2.10) |
| Quantitative Reference Type | Reference flow(s) |
| Dataset Time Domain Validity | True |
| Location | Canada (CA) |
| Included Processes | Empty |
| LCI Method Principle | Attributional |
| LCI Principles Deviations | Attributional LCI methods were used. |
| LCI Method Approaches | Allocation - mass |
| LCI Method Deviations | NA |
| Modelling Constants | NA |
| Modelling Constant Deviations | NA |
| Data Cutoff/Completeness Principles | NA |
| Deviations from Cutoff/Completeness Principles | NA |
| Data Selection/Combination Principles | Where provincial data was unavailable, data from another region (another province or Canada). |
| Deviations from Selection/Combination Principles | NA |
| Data Treatment and Extrapolation Principles | NA |
| Deviations from Treatment and Extrapolation Principles | NA |
| Supply Coverage | 100 |
| Dataset Use Advice | NA |
| Dataset Review Summary | Internal review was performed by Groupe AGÉCO comparing calculated values with other data sources. Data were reviewed by a scientific committee composed of beef industry, government and ENGO experts. External experts were also consulted. |
| Type of Dataset Modelling | Unit process, single operation |
| Dataset Source | FMS 2017 |
| Dataset Review Type | Independent internal review |
| Dataset Scope | Unit process(es), single operation |
| Dataset Review Method | Expert judgement |
| Technological Representativeness | Very good |
| Time Representativeness | Very good |
| Geographical Representativeness | Good |
| Completeness | Very good |
| Precision | Very good |
| Methodological Appropriateness and Consistency | Very good |
| Overall Quality | Very good |
| Reviewer | CRSB |
| Review Report Source | SCAC 2020 |
| Overall Compliance Approval | Not defined |
| Nomenclature Compliance | Not defined |
| Methodological Compliance | Not defined |
| Review Compliance | Not defined |
| Documentation Compliance | Not defined |
| Quality Compliance | Not defined |
| Exchanges | |
| Dataset Version | 01.00.000 |
| Dataset Intended Applications | The intended application of this dataset is to provide an LCI that integrates considerations at a regional and provincial level to facilitate data use in animal production LCAs in Canada, especially for beef production. |
| Dataset URI | ../processes/30717fb6-4209-493b-8b27-1a633ac38876.xml |
| Dataset Access Restrictions | No restrictions |
| Commissioner | Groupe AGÉCO |
| Data Entry | Groupe AGÉCO |
| Approval Source | SCAC 2020 |
| Owner | CRSB |
| Dataset Copyright | True |
| Dataset License Type | Free of charge for all users and uses |
| UUID | 30717fb6-4209-493b-8b27-1a633ac38876 |
| Timestamp | 2020-06-12T00:46:23+00:00 |