| Base Name | Stored hay from Saskatchewan |
| Treatments, Standards and Routes | Average hay storage |
| Mix and Location | Silage or haylage in vertical silo 2%, silage or haylage in horizontal silo (1%), silage or haylage sealed in plastic (3%) and hay in round bales (93%). |
| Functional Unit Flow Properties | The dataset includes material and infrastructure inputs, as well as storage loss. Quantities are per metric tonne of hay (corrected to 90% dry matter). |
| Name Synonyms | silage; haylage; bales |
| Quantitative Reference | stored hay |
| Dataset Starting Year | 2009 |
| Dataset Valid Until | 2018 |
| Time Representativity | Ten-year average |
| Technology Characteristics | NA |
| Intended Process Applications | Stored hay modelled in this dataset is intended for cattles. |
| Ecospold Activity Type | 1 |
| Ecospold Special Activity Type | 0 |
| Classification | Agricultural production means (2.10) |
| Quantitative Reference Type | Reference flow(s) |
| Dataset Time Domain Validity | True |
| Location | Canada (CA) |
| Included Processes | Empty |
| LCI Method Principle | Attributional |
| LCI Principles Deviations | Attributional LCI methods were used. |
| LCI Method Approaches | Allocation - mass |
| LCI Method Deviations | NA |
| Modelling Constants | NA |
| Modelling Constant Deviations | NA |
| Data Cutoff/Completeness Principles | NA |
| Deviations from Cutoff/Completeness Principles | NA |
| Data Selection/Combination Principles | Where provincial data was unavailable, data from another region (another province or Canada) or for field crops in general was used. Where data was not available over 10 years, data from a shorter period was used. |
| Deviations from Selection/Combination Principles | NA |
| Data Treatment and Extrapolation Principles | NA |
| Deviations from Treatment and Extrapolation Principles | NA |
| Supply Coverage | 100 |
| Dataset Use Advice | NA |
| Dataset Review Summary | Internal review was performed by Groupe AGÉCO comparing calculated values with other data sources. Data were reviewed by a scientific committee composed of beef industry, government and ENGO experts. External experts were also consulted. |
| Type of Dataset Modelling | Unit process, single operation |
| Dataset Source | FMS 2017 |
| Dataset Review Type | Independent internal review |
| Dataset Scope | Unit process(es), single operation |
| Dataset Review Method | Expert judgement |
| Technological Representativeness | Very good |
| Time Representativeness | Very good |
| Geographical Representativeness | Good |
| Completeness | Very good |
| Precision | Very good |
| Methodological Appropriateness and Consistency | Very good |
| Overall Quality | Very good |
| Reviewer | CRSB |
| Review Report Source | SCAC 2020 |
| Overall Compliance Approval | Not defined |
| Nomenclature Compliance | Not defined |
| Methodological Compliance | Not defined |
| Review Compliance | Not defined |
| Documentation Compliance | Not defined |
| Quality Compliance | Not defined |
| Exchanges | |
| Dataset Version | 01.00.000 |
| Dataset Intended Applications | The intended application of this dataset is to provide an LCI that integrates considerations at a regional and provincial level to facilitate data use in animal production LCAs in Canada, especially for beef production. |
| Dataset URI | ../processes/36f75942-76ac-4228-9673-95e9532006bf.xml |
| Dataset Access Restrictions | No restrictions |
| Commissioner | Groupe AGÉCO |
| Data Entry | Groupe AGÉCO |
| Approval Source | SCAC 2020 |
| Owner | CRSB |
| Dataset Copyright | True |
| Dataset License Type | Free of charge for all users and uses |
| UUID | 36f75942-76ac-4228-9673-95e9532006bf |
| Timestamp | 2020-06-12T00:21:42+00:00 |