| Base Name | Breeder flock feed mill |
| Treatments, Standards and Routes | Feed milling for egg supply chain breeder facilities |
| Mix and Location | Production mix, at feed mill gate |
| Functional Unit Flow Properties | NA |
| Name Synonyms | Breeder feed composition; breeder feed; |
| Quantitative Reference | One kilogram of feed produced |
| Dataset Starting Year | 2012 |
| Dataset Valid Until | 2012 |
| Time Representativity | Annual, for year 2012 |
| Technology Characteristics | None |
| Intended Process Applications | Feed output to be used in breeder facilities |
| Ecospold Activity Type | 1 |
| Ecospold Special Activity Type | 0 |
| Classification | Agricultural production means (2.10) |
| Quantitative Reference Type | Reference flow(s) |
| Dataset Time Domain Validity | True |
| Location | Canada (CA) |
| Included Processes | Empty |
| LCI Method Principle | Attributional |
| LCI Principles Deviations | Attributional |
| LCI Method Approaches | Allocation - gross calorific value |
| LCI Method Deviations | Allocation by gross chemical content |
| Modelling Constants | NA |
| Modelling Constant Deviations | NA |
| Data Cutoff/Completeness Principles | For breeder flock and pullet feeds, a cut-off threshold of 0.1% was employed unless the feed inputs had already been modeled for inclusion in the layer feeds. |
| Deviations from Cutoff/Completeness Principles | NA |
| Data Selection/Combination Principles | None |
| Deviations from Selection/Combination Principles | None |
| Data Treatment and Extrapolation Principles | Feed milling energy input data were instead derived from recent LCA studies of the US egg industry |
| Deviations from Treatment and Extrapolation Principles | NA |
| Supply Coverage | NA |
| Dataset Use Advice | Only used as feed input for Canadian breeder facilities |
| Dataset Review Summary | Internal review; Completeness checks for all survey responses; outliers excluded. |
| Type of Dataset Modelling | Unit process, single operation |
| Dataset Source | Egg industry baseline LCA |
| Dataset Review Type | Dependent internal review |
| Dataset Scope | Raw data |
| Dataset Review Method | Expert judgement |
| Technological Representativeness | Very good |
| Time Representativeness | Fair |
| Geographical Representativeness | Fair |
| Completeness | Very good |
| Precision | Very good |
| Methodological Appropriateness and Consistency | Very good |
| Overall Quality | Good |
| Reviewer | Nathan Pelletier |
| Review Report Source | Egg industry baseline LCA |
| Overall Compliance Approval | Not defined |
| Nomenclature Compliance | Not defined |
| Methodological Compliance | Not defined |
| Review Compliance | Not defined |
| Documentation Compliance | Not defined |
| Quality Compliance | Not defined |
| Exchanges | |
| Dataset Version | 01.00.002 |
| Dataset Intended Applications | Public release |
| Dataset URI | ../processes/f5bf19f9-bede-44e7-9702-56329a7912a5.xml |
| Dataset Access Restrictions | Free to use |
| Commissioner | Nathan Pelletier |
| Data Entry | Vivek |
| Approval Source | Egg industry baseline LCA |
| Owner | Nathan Pelletier |
| Dataset Copyright | True |
| Dataset License Type | Free of charge for all users and uses |
| UUID | f5bf19f9-bede-44e7-9702-56329a7912a5 |
| Timestamp | 2021-04-21T22:27:35+00:00 |